Home

›

News

›

Mitigating Flight Plan vs. Clearance Errors

Operational Insight

February 26, 2025

2

Mitigating Flight Plan vs. Clearance Errors

Flying the filed flight plan instead of the issued clearance is a leading cause of gross navigation errors; dual independent verification is the mitigation.

Oceanic Errors & Mitigation

A pilot's cap, epaulettes, and printed flight plan documents laid out for preflight review

Flying the filed flight plan instead of the issued clearance remains a leading cause of lateral deviations and gross navigation errors (GNEs). This is most common when a revised clearance with a route amendment is issued.

The most effective mitigation is robust standard operating procedures that incorporate dual independent verification when accepting, loading, and updating clearances in the FMS — and ensuring the Master Operational Flight Plan and plotting chart reflect the latest changes.

Dual independent verification guards against expectation bias and confirmation bias, two cognitive tendencies that can compromise safety. It should be applied to all flights, domestic or international, where FMS data is loaded from an external source.

REFERENCED REGULATIONS

FAA AC 91-70B

NAT Doc 007 Ver 2026.1

ICAO Doc 4444 PANS-ATM

ICAO Annex 11

NAT OPS Bulletin 2025-3

AUTHOR

Scott IPC Instructor Team

The Scott IPC instructor team: retired corporate chief pilots, FAA procedures and safety personnel, and former military aviators who teach international procedures.

KEEP READING

Related articles

See all news →

STAY CURRENT

Operational updates, delivered.

Regulatory changes, procedure updates, and instructor insights. About one email a month. No marketing fluff.

you@flightdepartment.com

Subscribe

We don't share email addresses. Unsubscribe at any time.